|
|
Place Your Bets on the All American Pump Reliability Derby
I found Kevin Delaney's article on the dependability difference of 3600 RPM and
1800 RPM pumps very interesting. I have always thought it common knowledge
that to double the RPM would increase the wear rate by a factor of four. I think a
lesson could be learned from Dr. Lev Nelik with his response to a letter to the
editor when he says that, knowledge should be based on field input on what works
and why. As Dr. Nelik explains, after spending lots of time in the field, he realized
how little is actually known by engineers for major pump manufacturers who know
little outside the comfort of their own desks. Dr. Nelik goes on to say that
“factual input would be refreshing from those who know it from personal
experience”, not hearsay from those behind a desk. I have personally installed and
repaired thousands of pumps both 3600 and 1800 RPM in the last thirty years. It
has been my experience that 1800 RPM pumps do usually last longer and can handle
abrasives better than 3600 RPM pumps. However, it has also been my experience
that RPM has less to do with premature pump and motor failures than does cycling
on and off or problems associated with variable speed drives. Greg Towsley of
Grundfos Pumps Corporation makes an excellent case for 3600 RPM pumps in his
letter “Place Your Bets”. I have installed many of the CR Series pumps that Greg
mentioned and have found them to be very dependable even when operated at close
to shut off conditions for extended periods of time. I did find it interesting that
Greg Towsley said that “MOST of their annual warranty cost are integrated
variable speed motor issues, not the pump”. This follows exactly what I have seen
with thousands of installations in the field. 1800 and 3600 RPM pumps are both
very dependable when not allowed to cycle on and off, and when not having to deal
with all the negative side effects created by variable speed drives.
Cary Austin
Cycle Stop Valves, Inc.
|